On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Brian Haberman wrote:
This is an update based on feedback received on the list and via
private e-mail. Please review and comment. I would still like to
solicit input on WG adoption.
Not sure what was the conclusion here, but I gave it a quick a read.
My main comment is that Section 4 only specifies the behaviour of the
EFO option (three MUSTs) on transmit. The behaviour on receipt
(particularly when those MUSTs are ignored) is unspecified.
I believe also the RA Option Bit 55-56 under IANA considerations
should be 54-55 (56 be off by one bít?).
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
