Hello, Le 8 juin 07 à 04:40, Joe Abley a écrit :
> My understanding of the CanSecWest authors' thinking with respect to > this particular technique is that the number of (A, B) waypoints in > the RH0 header would be varied such that for every one packet that > entered the A-B cyclotron, you could achieve N packets leaving > simultaneously, each having been round the A-B loop a different > number of times. That's a good summary. The values given in the slide are based on the simple computation of the number of packet you can inject per second : this depends on your upload bandwidth, the PMTU and the number of addresses in the RH0 (less addresses, more packets, as they are shorter). > Maximising the output of such a capacitor would require tuning the > RH0 extension header construction according to the observed round- > trip latency between A and B which seems non-trivial, but at the same > time not impossible. True, it is non-trivial. > Note that I have not explored the details of this with the CanSecWest > presenters, however; it's possible that they were thinking of > something different (and equally plausible that there's a fault with > my logic, above). nope, not AFAIK. a+ -- Arnaud Ebalard EADS Innovation Works - IT Sec Research Engineer PGP KeyID:047A5026 FingerPrint:47EB85FEB99AAB85FD0946F30255957C047A5026 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
