Hi,
Now that the new central ULA draft is out, I wanted to add a few
words of explanation.
The current authors got involved because we received a request from
people in the RIR community who thought there was merit in the
central ULA idea and a discussion had started in the RIRs. A lot has
changed since the previous central ULA draft was published and we
thought there was value in publishing a updated draft that defines a
feasible technical approach. We believe the new draft does this.
It's not perfect, but describes what we think at the important
elements and requirements.
I think I can speak for all of the authors in that none of us are
completely certain this is necessary, but we all think that if there
is going to be a debate in the IETF and RIR communities, then the
debate should be on a document that represents a viable solution.
None of us has a "religious" position on this and will be just as
happy if it the idea goes back to sleep. If there is community
support, we will push it through the process.
Bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
