On 27 Jun 2007, at 10:52am, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Thanks for the facts. It does seem like a childhood illness though - obviously it isn't sustainable as IPv6 grows up.
Most childhood illnesses go away but the /48 assignments made by ARIN and APNIC are permanent. What incentive is there - or will there be - for those organisations to return their prefixes and take PA space from one or more of their upstream providers? Presumably that incentive is what will keep ULA-C prefixes within a single site.
Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
