> > I am talking about a "laptop" that connects an arbitrarily-
> > complex internal network of virtual hosts and routers, and
> > an arbitrarily-complex set of external devices attached on,
> > e.g., Ethernet, Bluetooth, etc. ...

First, s/laptop/platform - where, a "platform" could be
something relatively small (like my laptop) or something
quite a bit larger (like a cruise ship). Any points
in-between (planes, trains, automobiles, etc.) also meet
the description. But, all of them are platforms and all
of them are also "sites".
 
> so, there's a routing protocol here?

Where do you mean by "here"?
 
> > So, it can't just be link-local-for-all, because then there
> > is no opportunity for off-link communications when in fact
> > the laptop may connect many links.
> 
> if the laptop is going to connect to many links, then it will
> get an address assigned for each of those links, by DHCP or
> stateless autoconf or even manual config.  giving the laptop
> its own UA will only make sense if there's a routing protocol
> by which that UA-block is advertised into the networks the
> laptop connects with.  so can you explain the routing?

Advertising the ULA block into a (visited) network that
only provides transit for the platform's communications
is not required. But, maybe that's not what you meant
(see below): 
 
> >                                     Also, if my laptop ever
> > needs to connect up with other sites (be it planned or ad-hoc;
> > via phisical links or virtual) it will need to have something
> > like ULA-C to avoid collisions. And, I don't want to have to
> > inject a globally-routable prefix into the DFZ for it.
> 
> forget the DFZ for a minute.  you will have to inject your UA
> into the network(s) you attach to.  how's that going to work?
> (and what's the horizon of that injection?)

You establish a link between two sites - perhaps aided by
information in the DNS. Then, you either have the IGPs
operating in the two formerly separate sites form an
adjacency over the link, or you set up static routes.

Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to