On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Paul Vixie wrote: <snip>
should be replaced with this one:| 7 bits |1| 8 bits | 16 bits | 16 bits | 80 bits | +--------+-+----------+---------+---------+----------+ | Prefix |L| Reserved | RIR Num | LIR Num | User Num | +--------+-+----------+---------+---------+----------+ where "Prefix" and "L" are defined as shown in central-02, and the other fields are defined as follows:
striks me as almost the same as the good old sTLA... <snip>
third, replace section 7.0 with the following: --- 7.0 IANA Considerations IANA is hereby instructed to reserve address block FC::/7 for private unique addresses, and to allocate /32 blocks to Regional Internet Address Registries (RIRs) who request same after adopting policies consistent with this specification. Allocation shall be similar in all ways to normal IANA address allocation to RIRs, including but not limited to IN-ADDR.ARPA delegations and WHOIS records. ---
so we are talking about full reverse control delegated to the person that get this ULA-C block?
except this piece about DNS mention above it look more promissing than the original draft.
-- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - IPv6 is The Key! ------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
