Having had my name on RFC 1918, I think understand some of the issues.
There is precisely one that I find at all interesting in this proposal,
having stated the concern in RFC 1627:
* avoiding collisions, and Geoff Huston's math demonstrates the
likelihood of that happening
But one needn't have reverse lookups delegated in the root to address
this concern.
I also understand something about the differences between ULA-C and RFC
1918. For one, this space will be unique within the limits of human
error. RFC 1918 not being unique meant that providers really had no
choice about blocking it, and IANA had no method to insert reverse
addresses to a particular site.
Eliot
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
