>> > Then you will fail in cases like the one I noted above, and you > won't be >> > RFC compliant. RFC2461 requires NUD on _all_ links. (I don't think >> > anyone is arguing it doesn't.) >> >> as long as we also agree that it is perfectly valid to operate p2p > links >> with NUD turned off. > > Yes (but only for router-to-router connections which I believe is what > you're referring to).
indeed. (our implementation doesn't do NUD on router to host p2p links either, but it obviously replies to NUD being initiated from the other peer in both cases.). NUD is a bad idea for router to host anyway, but don't get me started on that. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
