Hi Bob,

I have written the draft for the same, but never gotten around to
posting it. Will do that over the week.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On 8/28/07, Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On August 20, 2007, the IPv6 chairs started a new consensus call on
> RH0 Deprecation.  See:
>
>    http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg08477.html
>
> Our goal was to make sure there continued to be a consensus for
> deprecating RH0 as specified in the draft <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-
> rh0-01.txt>.
>
> As of 2000 GMT August 27, 2007 we received 18 responses (public and
> private) to the consensus call.  Of these responses 16 were for
>
>    1) Deprecate RH0 as specified in <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-
> rh0-01.txt>
>
> and two were for
>
>    2) Revising the draft to restrict the usage of RH0
>
> Based on this response to this consensus call, the chairs conclude
> that there continues to be a strong consensus for deprecating RH0.
> Later today we will send email to the ADs requesting that <draft-ietf-
> ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt> be published as a Proposed Standard RFC.
>
> We would also like to encourage anyone interested to write a draft
> for a safer routing header that could be considered by the working
> group.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
> IPv6 Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to