I think we had some material in the v6ops security overview draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview-06#section-2.1.1
but not in too much depth. Jari Christopher Morrow kirjoitti: > Is there an existing RFC/Draft discussion of RH0 pitfalls and > solutions to those pitfalls that discussses more than just the > host-based problems? Pekka has: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-savola-ipv6-rtheader-00.txt > > which looks like it's mostly host-based. There doesn't look like there > is a document to address the network side of this problem, yet. Would > that be useful? Would it be useful to add that to Pekka's draft? or a > separate draft? Is this WG the proper place for that? Pekka's draft is > a v6wg, this looks like a complement to that. > > I think a document like this would be useful as an educational > document for the case where RH0 is deprecated in the spec but not > available in all devices (such as in a transition or in > legacy/embedded devices). l think even if RH0 isn't deprecated this > would be useful educational material. > > -Chris > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
