On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:07 PM, ext Brian E Carpenter wrote:

We're arguing past each other.

I am never going to agree that we have a shortage of bits
in ::/64. If we waste those bits due to inserting an
unnecessary hierarchy in the prefix assignment process,
shame on us. If the current registry practices are having that
effect, then we need to work with the registries to change
their practices.

Choosing EUI-64 format was a strategic decision taken from
a very long term (many decades) viewpoint. I see no case
for changing that choice.

My personal view as well.

Bob


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to