Mark,
On 2007-10-22 02:24, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:22:08 +0200
Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/presentations/Dickson-lightning.pdf
and found some serious flaws and most likely misunderstandings in the
way that some things are presented in there. It was already publicly
presented at the NANOG meeting, so lets discuss ;)
<insert humble mode disclaimer etc />
Slide 2:
"We can’t fault the IETF -
they aren’t operators"
Some of us are.
I'd add that the more operators that care to participate in the
IETF, the better it will be for everybody.
I don't happen to agree with Brian Dickson's proposed change,
but I think it's important to discuss why he thinks it's
necessary from an operational viewpoint to permit such sparse
allocation of prefix bits.
Brian Carpenter
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
