-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is something that came out of some of the SAVA work, but also
has relevance to the RFC 3704 discussion. I'd be interested in the
working group's thoughts.
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 8, 2007 2:01:04 AM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: draft-baker-6man-multiprefix-default-route-00.txt is a new
draft
You posted a new draft today. In the interest of informing your Cisco
colleagues, would you be so kind as to fill the rest of us in on your
project and what the draft is about?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-6man-multiprefix-
default-route-00.txt
"Multiprefix IPv6 Routing for Ingress Filters", Fred Baker, 7-
Nov-07,
<draft-baker-6man-multiprefix-default-route-00.txt>
The abstract you included reads:
This note addresses routing in a network that supports multiple
prefixes and has different DMZs, in the context of BCPs 38 and 84
(ingress filtering). It proposes a change to the way IPv6 forwarding
occurs, and so should be considered carefully by the Internet
community.
There is more background at http://wwwin-people/fred/explanation.html
By the way, if you're not on ietf-interest, you may find it an
interesting list to join.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFHM0Q8bjEdbHIsm0MRAi8jAJ0XM5Ls6OoIQAVBPk/qQW/R0hqiiQCfUXTQ
waLbY1/Hkr/O7UdfYXZTNVk=
=6V2r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
