> > Now you might want to configure your DNS proxy (resursive 
> server) to 
> > not pass through AAAA records with ULA addresses unless 
> they are from 
> > known sources with whom you have a prior arrangement.
> > But that is a different issue.
> 
> Now the DNS must know about routing?

Why would the DNS need to know anything about routing?
ULA addressing is intended for local use. If an organization
wants to enforce that policy by putting filters in their
routers which talk to the public Internet, they are free 
to do so. If they want to put filters in the DNS servers
which talk to the public Internet, they are free to do
so. The DNS filters are about policy, and have nothing to
do with routing.

You are the one who said that somebody might put ULA 
addresses in AAAA records that are visible to the Internet
instead of running proper split-horizon for their internal
DNS. If I want to protect my DNS and my systems from somebody
elses misconfigurations, then filtering and proxying is the
standard way to do it, regardless of whether we are talking
about routing packets, DNS queries, http queries 
or telephone calls.

--Michael Dillon

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to