[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are looking for 2001:0DB8::/32
What I'm looking for now is a 2nd documentation prefix, that
would differ in the first bit. Such that nobody could say
that this prefix X has an aggregation relationship with
2001:db8::/32. Such that I can picture a Router with two
non-hierarchical non-aggregated prefixes on its two interfaces.
You could use a ULA address such as fd67:039d:7a3a::/48
That differs in the first bit.
Thanks - right, that's a good candidate. E.g. fd67:39d:7a3a::/48 and
2001:db8::/32 differ in the first bit so no-one could ever say they're
aggregated - that's what I'm looking for.
It could be a waste though to register it just for use in a Internet
Draft, I don't want stop others using that particular prefix for their
real local deployments.
I will however suggest it. For info, this is about discussion around
addressing architectures for AUTOCONF WG.
Alex
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
