On 2007-12-06 13:28, Per Heldal wrote:
...
By that I mean that the IETF shouldn't be involved in address
distribution matters unless there's technical reason for it,
That is well understood and was written into the IETF/IANA
agreement 7 years ago.
and ULA
does IMHO not qualify as such.
IMHO ULA does qualify, in fact must qualify, since ULAs
have technical impact (see my previous note and Tony Hain's
comment on it).
To go further, PI should qualify too, since the allocation of
PI poses a serious technical threat to the scaling of the
routing system.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
