Mike Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And while it isn't a surmountable problem > > 5. We are being forced to treat all of our IPv6 enabled protocols such > as FTP as encryption items by the U.S. export authorities because > the U.S. government thinks they must be since IPv6 "includes > security". It's just plain silly since our IPv6 is no different > than our IPv4 - both get all their security from our IPsec which > is sold separately. But we can't convince them otherwise because it > has been mandated that all IPv6 nodes shall support IPsec. > We can sell our IPv6 code without any trace of IPsec save for a few > lines of interface code that are #ifdef'd out when IPsec isn't present > and yet our IPv6 stack and worse yet, all of the socket-layer apps > that support IPv6, are viewed as encryption items. Good grief.
This sounds completely bogus to me. I've never heard of this problem before. Who else has this problem? Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
