Hi all, The RFC 4294-bis draft has the following requirement, which comes from the initial RFC.
8.1. Basic Architecture Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol [RFC-4301] MUST be supported. 8.2. Security Protocols ESP [RFC-4303] MUST be supported. AH [RFC-4302] MUST be supported. We have had a lot of discussion that people basically feel that these requirements are not applicable and should be moved to SHOULD. I would say that there is rough WG Consensus on this. Do people feel if there should be additional text to explain this? I suggest that the WG Chairs and our ADs discuss this with the Security ADs to ensure that this is a reasonable consensus to adopt - so that we do not run into issues during the eventual IETF/IESG review. I am not sure that we can go much further in discussions in the WG. Does anyone have comments on this approach? John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
