At Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:34:13 -0500, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have recast our draft into an "IPv6 Subnet Model" draft. After > discussing with Thomas Narten and Erik Nordmark it was felt that the > IPv6 subnet model is really not explained anywhere in any existing IPv6 > document. That is why we recast our draft and also welcomed Erik as a > co-author to our draft - please see the text of the new Abstract below. > > The new version has a lot of sections removed from the old draft. A very > short new version now exists for review. I've read the draft and found that this version is now clear and has a point. I generally support this document. One minor comment is that it'd be better to clarify (more clearly) that this document doesn't introduce any new rule but clarifies some points that have often been misunderstood. The Security Considerations section mention that (for a different purpose), but I think it's better to state it earlier, probably in the Introduction. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
