Arifumi san, No problem with the delay. I will go thru this doc and understand the problems you have found and see what we could do here.
Thanks. Hemant -----Original Message----- From: arifumi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:55 PM To: Hemant Singh (shemant) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Use longest-matching prefix to the next hop Hi, > I suggest the same to the authors of > draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-sol-00.txt. Could you please first > describe what is the problem with SAS as specified in RFC 3484. > > Hemant sorry for the looong delay, As stated in this document section 1, Today, the RFC 3484 mechanism is widely implemented in major OSs. However, many people, including us, have found that in many sites the default address-selection rules are not appropriate for the network structure. PS [I-D.ietf-v6ops-addr-select-ps] lists problematic cases that resulted from incorrect address selection. PS document describes the problems related to RFC 3484 default address selection. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
