+1
On 3/13/08 6:44 PM, "Francis Dupont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps some of us didn't remember but: > - I predicted the RFC 3484 will be always at least a phase back from > what we want. > - I predicted too it would take a not reasonable amount of time to > get the document published or updated. > Unfortunately both predictions were right so again I propose to make > this a BCP and *not* a standard track document. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > PS: I did this at the iterim meeting in Redmond, WA, in 2001... > (I also suggested to pick up DHCPv6 as the right way to perform > prefix delegation, a proposal which was strongly rejected at this time :-) > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
