FYI Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Jukka MJ Manner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: May 14, 2008 3:51:08 PM GMT+02:00 > To: Transport Area WG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Internet Area <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO > value 3 > > > Hi, > > We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and > allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations. > > There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP: > "1" Datagram contains RSVP message [RFC2711] > "3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0 [RFC3175] > > We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from > use, and > reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1" > should be > used to indicate end-to-end RSVP. > > The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would > this > change break something? > > Regards, > Jukka > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
