On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, JINMEI Tatuya / ???? wrote:
I wonder if off-list discussion qualifies as "IETF discussion". Or
has this been raised on a list somewhere?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet6/nd6_nbr.c.diff?r1=1.52;r2=1.53
I guess we have a problem.
It was me who suggested the comment, so if the wording surprised you
it was my fault. I meant by "IETF discussion" a series of e-mail
threads including this one:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg09544.html
...
Aside from the possibly inappropriate comment wording, does that
address your concern?
Apologies. My "I guess we have a problem" could be interpreted to
apply to a) "the IETF discussion" comment, b) that there is no
official update going on with this effort, or c) both. My intent was
to use it to b) only.
I think it's a serious problem that we see issues in the specs, we
discuss them, yet we don't track them and we don't reach closure on
how to proceed with them.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
