>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:26 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [dhcwg] /128 address allocation and "localized 
>IPv6 addressspace exhaustion",was RE: Brokenness of specs 
>w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits
>
>On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>> Consider cellular host case:
>>>> - host implements e.g. ND proxy and DHCPv6 PD for WAN connection
>>>> sharing
>>>> - host attaches to a network where only DHCPv6 happens to be used
>>>> - host gets single /128 IPv6 address from DHCPv6
>>>> - host tries to get some prefixes for its LAN interface with DHCPv6
>>>> PD, but network's policy rejects the prefix request
>...
>> IMHO network that is giving out only /128 to hosts that are providing
>> "network sharing feature" is forcefully creating "localized 
>IPv6 address
>> space exhaustion scenario" for the hosts, which I fear may be tackled
>> with mechanisms familiar from IPv4 address exhaustion scenarios, i.e.
>> with IPv6 NAPT.
>
>FWIW, I agree this would be a problem.
>
>But, maybe there is an implementable workaround to this operational 
>issue.  Would it be possible for the host to either 1) run DHCPv6 
>again, with a different DUID or client identifier (could it get more 
>/128's that way, or 2) use DHCPv6 IAs to request multiple addresses? 
>Then it would proxy these specific addresses instead of a whole /64. 
>If neither of these is possible, how would this scenario be different 
>from the mobile terminal operating as a L2 bridge and multiple devices 
>behind it requesting addresses with DHCPv6?

I have a couple of related questions regarding /128s:

1) can a requesting router use DHCPv6 prefix delegation to
obtain /128's from a delegating router?

2) Must a requesting router examine the M&O bits in another
router's RAs before determining that DHCPv6 PD can be used?

Thank you,
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>
>-- 
>Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
>Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
>Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to