I did not include some related work on tunneling, that maybe should be.Please comment if I have missed any drafts, or mis-characterized any of these as to WG, status or category. Or any other suggestions to make it more useful.
v6ops WG
Behave WG
Softwires WG
Other or unspecified WG
Framework, scenarios, comparison
*Draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework*
Draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence
Draft-wing-nat-pt-replacement-comparison
Draft-despres-sam-scenarios
Problem Statements, requirements
*Draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req*
Draft-miyata-behave-prefix64
Draft-jennings-behave-nat6
Solutions
/Draft-despres-v6ops-apbp/
*draft-baker-behave-v4v6-translation*
*Draft-durand-softwire-dual-stack-lite*
Draft-despres-sam
*draft-bagnulo-behave-dns64*
*draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64*
Draft-baker-behave-ivi
/Draft-xli-behave-ivi/
*draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity*
“helpers”
*Draft-denis-behave-v4v6exthdr*
Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International
Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research
Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch
732-389-1003 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
roadmap.doc
Description: MS-Word document
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
