Hi,
We have implemented RFC5006 internally and we tested the implementation
against publicly available RADVD.
Not included in our currently selling devices, though.
Best regards,
Teemu
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of ext Brian E Carpenter
>Sent: 16 November, 2008 21:07
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Loughney John (Nokia-D/MtView); 'Brian Haberman'; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Node Requirement: New issue 5: Support for RFC 5006
>
>Has anyone reported implementation experience with 5006?
>If so, we could discuss reclassifying it IMHO. But perhaps we
>should separate that question from progressing the node-req update.
>
> Brian
>
>On 2008-11-16 07:39, Tony Hain wrote:
>> The experimental designation is just wrong. We have to break the
>> current requirement to deploy both RA & DHCP if you want to
>have a working network.
>> Each model should be able to stand on its own, and 5006 fills a hole
>> on that side. The 'experiment' is simply there to placate those that
>> want a DHCP-only model. Change the status of the RFC & make
>it a node
>> requirement...
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Behalf
>>> Of Brian Haberman
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:06 PM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Node Requirement: New issue 5: Support for RFC 5006
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>> I recieved a question:
>>>>
>>>> What about RFC5006 "Router Advertisement Option for DNS
>>> Configuration",
>>>> or is it problem that it is of experimental category?
>>>>
>>>> My feeling is that this is experimental, so it cannot really be a
>>>> requirement.
>>>>
>>>> What does the working group think?
>>>>
>>> Given that this is an Experimental spec, I would contend that we
>>> cannot include it as a requirement for nodes. I think this
>holds for
>>> any Experimental specification.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Brian
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>[email protected]
>Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
