-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sorry for crossposting to IPv6 and NAT66.


There is kind of stallmate.

Without NAT66 we wont get IPv6.
We do not want NAT66 but we need IPv6.

My idea - let us have NATted islands
within a NATfree IPv6.

With symmetrical NAT66 we could undo
what NAT66 has done.

For this we need an extension header
that includes the original, pre NAT66
addresses, ports and checksums.

Yet another header everybody needs to
know of and respect?

draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-06

shows how this can be done "once and for all"
so we do not need to bother again how to
treat new unknown headers next week again.

By the way a symmetrical NAT66 after reinstalling
the original header, could remove the extension
header.

Kind regards
Peter


- --
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
Rimbacher Strasse 16
D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher
+49(6209)795-816 (Telekom)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.peter-dambier.de/
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
ULA= fd80:4ce1:c66a::/48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJOdIsoQA0qetcyygRArhBAJ9dfIQ7ME65oz1ySq3XnIqTS5bEzwCbBgNQ
zRxZ2EiDLCCd2cTpoFsMT50=
=KVcH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to