On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:32:17PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > The -02 draft hasn't been posted yet, but I've seen a preview, > and I fully support it (the comments I made earlier on the v6ops > list have been incorporated). In fact, I think it should probably > be a BCP, since it recommends what is already done in many > implementations.
+1 The NETMOD WG is currently adopting the same format as the canonical representation of IPv6 addresses. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
