Looks very good, Vishwas. You may consider softening this from a "MUST" to a "SHOULD", though, given that hosts are at this stage not guaranteed to always produce non-overlapping fragments.
- Christian On May 28, 2009, Vishwas Manral wrote:
Hi Christian, Ok. I think to make it more generic we can call it a middlebox instead of a firewall alone. The text could be : "IPv6 nodes or middleboxes that receive a fragment that overlaps with a previously received fragment MUST cease the reassembly process and MUST discard the previously received fragments with the same IPv6 Source Address, IPv6 Destination Address and Fragment Identification." Thanks, Vishwas
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
