Primarily because it still required work on SEND extensions before the security story was complete. The CSI WG was then chartered to do that work (among other things).
-Dave From: Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:20 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Dave Thaler Subject: Experimental status of RFC 4389? ND Proxy 6man folks, Does anyone know why RFC 4389 was deemed as Experimental for status as opposed to say, Standards Track? Thanks, Hemant
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
