Tony, Could you provide some background on:
1) why reissue this document at this time 2) what has changed in the document relative to previous versions? Finally, IMO, based on previous discussions, this document is/was effectively dead. There has always been a lot of controversy with C-ULAs, and there simply hasn't been consensus to move the document forward. What has changed since the last time the WG had a discussion about ULAs? Is there some new information we should be considering? I do not think it is particularly useful (or pleasant) to have a replay of old positions on this topic, if in fact, no minds will change. So unless there is a compelling reason to revisit C-ULAs at this time, I'm not at all sure we need to have this discussion yet again. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
