It would be a helpful reminder for AS if we keep the second sentence: It is > noted that a number of applications do not work with addresses > generated with this method, while other applications work quite > well with them.
Hongyu ================================= > Note also that I propose dropping: > > It is recommended that this behavior be configurable on a > connection basis within each application when available. It is > noted that a number of applications do not work with addresses > generated with this method, while other applications work quite > well with them. > > The above recommendation is not in RFC 4941, and I do not > believe it is appropriate for an AS to be adding a > requirement that 4941 itself does not mention. > > Comments? > > Thomas > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
