Maybe you can tell me otherwise, but while the neighbor would not be
able to prove ownership, in an FCFS SAVI environment it seems likely
that it could gain control of the address, the first guy having
relinquished it.
I looked through RFC 3756, and it seemed to me that this was an
additional case. Again willing to be told I'm wrong.
On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Erik Nordmark wrote:
Fred Baker wrote:
Filename: draft-baker-ipv6-nd-session-hijack
Revision: 00
Title: Session Hijack in Neighbor Discovery
Creation_date: 2009-07-28
WG ID: Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 5
Abstract:
This memo is to point out a security issue in IPv6 Neighbor
Discovery.
This is a subset of the issues specified in RFC 3756 'IPv6 Neighbor
Discovery (ND) Trust Models and Threats'.
Your draft says that this is an issue with SeND. Can you clarify how
this can happen with SeND?
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
