Great. Thank you Fred. -----Original Message----- From: Fred Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:05 AM To: Azinger, Marla Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
On Jul 29, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Azinger, Marla wrote: > Routing in such an environment calls for a routing protocol. Each CPE > must run either RIPv6 [RFC2080], IS-IS [RFC5308], or OSPF [RFC5340] on > a default route and to the homes interal upstream a static default > route. The issues raised in [RFC3704] also apply, meaning that the two > CPE routers may each need to observe the source addresses in datagrams > they handle to divert them to the other CPE to handle upstream I'll figure something out there. This makes it sound like only the CPE routers have to run a routing protocol; in fact, all of the routers in the home have to run a routing protocol. But yes, something like that. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
