I would be sorry to waste so much bandwidth, but it's your fault for
coming up with these unworkable use cases:
So, we have two standards-compliant alternatives in IPv6 that would
not require you to calculate a UDP checksum on the entire payload:
(1) UDP-Lite: Is there a reason why UDP-Lite isn't a reasonable
choice for LISP encapsulation?
As I explained before, you don't need port numbers to load balance in
IPv6 so no need for UDP here, light or otherwise.
You would expect 64-translators to convert UDP-Lite/IPv6 into UDP-
Lite/IPv4
and back. Converting UDP-Lite/IPv6-with-8-bytes-coverage into UDP/
IPv4-
without-checksum sounds hackish :(
Then don't run LISP through an IPv4/IPv6 translator. It's not going to
work anyway.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
