On Aug 11, 2009, at 14:23 , Margaret Wasserman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2009, at 3:58 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
If you want LISP on a desktop OS you need to update that OS, hence
at the same time you can patch it to handle the 0 UDP checksum
consequently. I do not see any real issue here.
So, if I want LISP on a non-open-source desktop, you think I should
just wait until the OS vendor gives it to me?
You have to wait only if you want the solution proposed by the vendor
of the OS.
Why is this any more reasonable than telling ISPs that if they want
to support LAG/ECMP for LISP flows, they need to buy new routers?
I did not claim that (or anything alike).
Luigi
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
