Fred, Thank you very much for your pointing the important precedent work.
Consequently, we should narrow down the focus and succinctly put the issue toward -01 version. It is also pretty much in line with the feedbacks we got from today's WG meeting. Thank you !! Miya > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:54 AM > To: Miya Kohno > Cc: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉; Becca Nitzan; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: comments on draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt > > A note you may find interesting in this context is: > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5375.txt > 5375 IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations. G. Van de Velde, > C. Popoviciu, T. Chown, O. Bonness, C. Hahn. December 2008. > (Format: > TXT=83809 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > > You already reviewed RFC 3627, which is good. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
