> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Templin, Fred L > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: New draft on "Stub Router Advertisements in IPv6 Neighbor Discovery" > > Hello 6man, > > I have posted a new draft titled: > > "Stub Router Advertisements in IPv6 Neighbor Discovery" > http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-templin-6man-stub-router
Sorry; it looks like this link isn't working. Please try this one: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-templin-6man-stub-router-00 Fred [email protected] > The main idea is that RFC4861 specifies the operation of > routers wrt sending and receiving Router Advertisements > (RAs), but it makes no distinction between different > classes of routers that may occur on a link. This document > identifies two classes of routers: 1) those that connect > a link to a provider network, and are thus "authoritative" > for the link, and 2) those that connect stub networks to > the link but do not directly connect the link to a > provider network. > > This latter class of routers is not discussed in RFC4861, > but the present document provides an analysis of the > conditions under which a stub router may send RAs and > specifies the information that stub routers may include > in their RAs. > > I would like to see this document considered as a work > item under the 6man wg, and I would welcome any comments > and discussion on the draft. > > Thanks - Fred > [email protected] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
