Hi Brian, On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:52:30 +1300 Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The lawful intercept question is an interesting one, but > > as you say if the ISP owns both the L2 and L3 infrastucture > > there should be a way to support it. It may be much more > > challenging to do the intercept from L2 switches located > > close to the CPEs, however, since you may need many points > > of intercept in order to watch all CPEs. > > > >> I think it'd be useful if this draft or associated ones provided a > >> mechanism applicable to this ISP scenario. > > > > OK. Thanks. > > However, the IETF policy stated in RFC2804 says > > "1. Summary position > > The IETF has decided not to consider requirements for wiretapping as > part of the process for creating and maintaining IETF standards." > > so while this issue may affect actual deployment scenarios, it can't > directly affect our protocol design requirements here. > I think a "prefix redirect" mechanism is justified because it provides more optimal forwarding for inter-CPE traffic. I only brought up the LI issue and addressed it because that seemed to be the only objection there was to the idea when I suggested it before. I don't think it is a valid concern, and if the IETF has decided not to consider LI type requirements, then it is one less thing any drafts have to address and document. > (I would suggest that statements of agreement or disagreement with > this IETF policy don't belong on this list.) > > Brian Regards, Mark. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
