> If WKP(64:FF9B::/96) is the consensus, it better to state clearly that WKP > should not apply U/G requirements in the > draft, right?
The U/G bits in 64:FF9B::/96 are set to zero, so there is no need for an exception. > How about this: "When using a /96 prefix, except the WKP that start with the > binary > value 000, the administrators MUST ensure that the bits 64 to 71 are set to > zero." Except this requirement applies to "administrators", who cannot legitimately obtain a prefix in ::/8. These prefixes can only be defined by IETF action. -- Christian Huitema -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
