> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:31 PM
> To: Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Cc: Dan Wing; 
> [email protected]; 
> 'IETF IPv6 Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation
> 
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >>    1) Mandate that the text representation is <SOMETHING>
> >>    and never changes after this.
> >>
> >>    2) Mandate that the text representation is <SOMETHING>
> >>    but take into account new WKPs.
> >>
> >>    3) Mandate that the text representation is <SOMETHING>
> >>    but require that external mechanisms help recognize
> >>    even dynamically assigned IPv4/IPv6 prefixes.
> >>
> >>    4) As above, but specify a mandatory external mechanism.
> >
> > My main interest is textual comparability of addresses coming from
> > potentially many different sources. If I can compare 
> addresses safely
> > only if I know some context information communicated out of 
> band or I
> > have to configure all sources to produce the same, I feel somewhat
> > uneasy. My preference thus is 1), I might be OK with 2) if the
> > frequency of the introduction of new WKPs is very small.
> 
> While I like to see v4 address in a readable form when its used that 
> way, I have to say I agree with Jürgen's concerns, especially if the 
> algorithm was applied to opertor-specific prefixes as well (the tool 
> would have to have this OOB intelligence).
> 
> However, in some cases I'm not sure if comparison equality is really 
> such a big deal.  I don't think there's a way to satisfy both 
> "embedded v4 readability" and "absolute comparability" so a tradeoff 
> must be made.
> 
> So, I'd actually suggest that we go for 1) or 2) but soften that a 
> bit, like: "if it is known by some external method that the prefix 
> includes an IPv4 address, the representation MAY print it in dotted 
> decimal". With "external method" I'm thinking of either a 
> command-line 
> argument or application's own logic; I don't see how you could get 
> that information "dynamically" so that it would be available to 
> applications (for example, I don't see apps like that using DHCP 
> information..).

Works for me.

-d


> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to