-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Suresh
I was just asking myself why I was being asked this question. I realised that the mandatory usage clause was left out when editing a few versions ago. (I can remember writing that down in some version in the past but don't remember which) Do you think the following would work? I merged "4.2.2. Handling One 16 bit 0 Field" with your text 4.2.1. When to use "::" If the address contains at least two consecutive 16-bit 0 fields, "::" MUST be used to compress consecutive 16-bit 0 fields. The symbol "::" MUST NOT be used to shorten just one 16 bit 0 field. For example, the representation 2001:db8:0:1:1:1:1:1 is correct, but 2001:db8::1:1:1:1:1 is not correct. Regards, Seiichi Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Seiichi, > > On 10-04-25 08:11 PM, Seiichi Kawamura wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Brett >> >> Its both. > > While this may be the intent of the draft, it is unclear if "::" MUST > always be used if there are at least two consecutive 16-bit 0 fields. I > think it is a good idea and this can be accomplished by adding another > subsection e.g. > > 4.2.0 Mandatory usage > If the address contains at least two consecutive 16-bit 0 fields, "::" > MUST be used to compress consecutive 16-bit 0 fields as described in the > following sections. > > Thanks > Suresh > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkvVJFYACgkQcrhTYfxyMkKC4QCeLyu596DXFs8Mafgqdg7ByH1s O0AAnAytBxYyGerfx+Kjoiex7IJxgNsw =8BiU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
