> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Brian Haberman
> All, > This is a consensus call to determine if there is interest in > having 6MAN adopt the two RPL drafts (draft-hui-6man-rpl-option and > draft-hui-6man-rpl-routing-header). Please state your opinion on the > mailing list by June 25th, 2010. It would be interesting to see discussion of how ROLL and MANET do or do not overlap in their intended use cases. ROLL seems far less chaotic than MANET, however MANET would ideally be able to subsume the ROLL roles very nicely. However, given that the use cases of ROLL are outside the scope of the question, then I support the RH4 solution. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
