Hi, The draft is discussing about inter-router backbone link, where "directly-connected neighbor" has a significant meanings from routing protocol point of view. So it needs to be assumed "on-link".
Miya Sent from my iPhone On 28 juil. 2010, at 18:56, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <[email protected]> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Matsuzaki Yoshinobu [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:14 AM > To: Hemant Singh (shemant) > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 > > >> To establish an external-BGP session on a link that two routers are >> connected to, the two routers need to be on-link each other on the > link. >> And we are using /127 for these links in our network. > > We were told in the 6man presentation yesterday that the two routers are > not connected to any hosts or any other node but just connected to each > other. So where does the question arise wrt external BGP sessions? > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
