Just on one point:

On 2010-07-31 04:17, George, Wes E IV [NTK] wrote:
...
> "we can't use flow label for something like draft-carpenter-flow-ecmp because 
> 3697 says it has to be immutable"

But that is a completely false argument. The model described in
that draft is 100% consistent with an immutable flow label. In fact
there is nothing in 3697 that prevents ECMP, LAG or the model in
draft-donley-softwire-dslite-flowlabel

The usage models I know of that violate 3697 are documented in
draft-hu-flow-label-cases.

     Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to