In message <[email protected]>, Brian E Carpenter writes:
> On 2010-08-03 01:52, Etienne Gallet de Santerre wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> > 
> > I am a PhD student working on home networking, and especially on
> > multihoming.
> > 
> > I agree Ole and think that multihoming will be no longer the privilege
> > of industries, but will be available to home networks too.
> > 
> > As a home network is not be managed by an administrator in most cases,
> > the solutions have to be simple and automatic.
> > So, these networks will have to deal with PA prefixes, renumbering,
> > internal routing and so on.
> > Finally, if home networks have solutions to deal with it, why industries
> > can't do the same?
> 
> Etienne,
> 
> I believe, and hope, that we can devise solutions that work more or less
> transparently for off-the-shelf home deployment, and maybe even for
> small offices. (That's assuming I believe that SOHO users will have
> multiple ISPs; I have my doubts about that, but never mind.) The
> reason is that SOHO users in general absolutely don't care what their
> address is; they may renumber every time they reboot, so why would they
> care if they have two addresses? So yes, as Ole says, this is solvable.

We can't use the IPv4 experience as a guide here.  99.9% of home
networks are behind a NAT so they have stable internal addressing
even when the external address changes on every reboot of the NAT.
We need to ensure that there is stable internal addressing (ULA
helps here).  Addresses used to reach external servers however can
change without much worry.
 
> The problem for larger corporate networks, especially multi-office
> companies, is *much* harder. They don't add or change IP prefixes
> easily. Please see RFC 5887. Almost all of it applies to the multi-prefix
> case as well as to simple renumbering.
> 
>     Brian

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to