Hemant and I discussed this draft. Why doesn't the RG send an NS(DAD) for the LLA out to the Edge Router and have the Edge Router set up a tunnel with the RG. Then, the RA can be tunnelled using the unicast LLA to the RG and decapsulated at the RG. This would avoid having the Edge Router to support a new option and avoids having multicast messages sent with a unicast L2 - but still achieves the goal of having a customized RA for each RG.
- Wes On 8/10/10 2:08 PM, "Brian Haberman" <[email protected]> wrote: > 6MAN WG, > This is a consensus call on adopting: > > Title : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation > messages > Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > Filename : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2010-08-04 > > as a 6MAN working group document. Please state your opinion, positive > or negative, on the mailing or to the chairs. This consensus call will > end on August 27, 2010. > > Regards, > Brian & Bob > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
