Hi Ole,
On 10-08-19 09:01 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
Alan,
Don't you have that same problem regardless of the LIO?
If you have an IPv6 host directly connected to say your loving Residential Gateway and it sends 3 RS messages you have the same issue, right?
Also, the likelihood of losing 3 RS messages are highly unlikely, you would have better probability doing the Lottery and winning!
SLAAC works with periodic RAs. so in the above scenario SLAAC would work, it
would just take a little longer.
if what is proposed in rs-mark is only to use 'triggered by RS' unicast RA's
then I think you are breaking how SLAAC is intended to work.
That is not what is being proposed in the draft. If you can point to
such text in the draft, I will gladly remove it. To reiterate, there is
nothing in the draft that proposes not sending multicast RAs without
receiving RSs.
if you _do_ send periodic multicast advertisements even without PIO options,
you should be OK I think.
This is the case.
Thanks
Suresh
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
