-----Original Message----- From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: venerdì 10 settembre 2010 12.10 To: Maglione Roberta Cc: Mark Smith; [email protected]; Fred Baker Subject: RE: New version available
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Maglione Roberta wrote: >> PPP is not used here. There are numerous different deployment models, PPP >> is an expensive one that should be avoided unless there is serious use for >> it. > > While it is true that PPP is not used here, I won't say that PPP should > be avoided. PPP is a valid and widely deployed model in DSL Broadband > environment; Broadband Forum has already published TR-187 that explains > how to deploy IPv6 with PPP. > > In addition in case of bridged Layer 2 RG model, PPP + SLAAC with the > /64 announced in the RA PIO is a valid solution. >I didn't say it wasn't valid, I said it should be avoided due to high > cost. This is my opinion and I stand by it. > My problem is that people seem to think that just because IPv6 deployment > is fixed in PPP environments, now things are DONE. They are not. There are > numerous other deployment models in wide use that have not been properly > adressed yet. I didn't say things are done, I just described an alternative model. In addition in my opinion for the migration from PPP to IP Sessions there are still a lot of unsolved issues even with IPv4 Sessions, without talking about IPv6. Regards, Roberta -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
