On 2010-09-14 10:12, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> 
>> On 2010-09-14 07:59, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> [..]
>>> Does this sound like madness or something that might be of use? What WG
>>> might be best suited to bring this idea to?
>>
>> What part can not be achieved with WHOIS/RPSL already?
> 
> Why aren't people using WHOIS for DNSBL? Massive amount of questions are
> frowned upon by the people who run whois servers.

I assume you mean queries instead of questions. They rate limit that
mostly though to avoid robots from querying all the person objects and
snarf the (email) address details.

>> The bigger issue though is just like WHOIS though: folks don't update.
>> And of course, folks will lie...
> 
> Absolutely, nothing is perfect.
> 
>> WHOIS is pretty meaningless for addresses and contacts already in quite
>> a number of cases, adding more data will only add more nonsense.
> 
> My idea wasn't to use WHOIS for this, I was more thinking in lines of
> reverse-DNS but in new structure (under arpa.) or something completely new.
> 
> I think there is a need to somehow publish this information and do it
> dynamically, and I don't think WHOIS is the way to go.

Publishing policy in a consistent and parseable manner is a good idea
indeed.

Bill Manning's link (see his mail) shows something along the lines that
you are thinking about I guess, but instead of creating a new domain one
could also stuff it in the existing reverse DNS space similar to _spf
records are done on forward domains, thus eg
_policy.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa; but maybe a separate domain (and thus
unfortunately all the trust involved in delegating that and maintaining
it) is a better idea as then one can have a more specific for a certain
block.

Maybe it is time to convert WHOIS into rpsl.arpa, but storing
person/contact data that does not want to published there in the current
RIR whois services, thus just having policy information?

There is though a lot one can do with RPSL queries that won't be
feasible with DNS.

Greets,
 Jeroen
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to